<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Older isn&#8217;t always better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2010/01/older-isnt-always-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2010/01/older-isnt-always-better/</link>
	<description>critical analysis and interesting ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: <img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=7accb588a9a099f9e35c621c9348a24e&#38;size=48&#38;default=http://www.thoughtcounts.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/0570fe09c90f925.png" alt="Emily K Identicon Icon" height="48" width="48" /> Emily K</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2010/01/older-isnt-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-10165</link>
		<dc:creator><img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=7accb588a9a099f9e35c621c9348a24e&#38;size=48&#38;default=http://www.thoughtcounts.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/0570fe09c90f925.png" alt="Emily K Identicon Icon" height="48" width="48" /> Emily K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtcounts.net/?p=789#comment-10165</guid>
		<description>What differentiates this diet a little more from the &quot;old fashioned, normal&quot; diet is that a &quot;normal&quot; diet could include any number of processed foods, so long as the calories add up to the right amount. I&#039;m all for enjoying the benefits of technology, such as pasteurization and refrigeration, but I also like my food to be.. food. And this isn&#039;t a millenial &quot;green-minded&quot; trend - Upton Sinclair noted in the 1910&#039;s the appalling conditions (and often ingredients) used to process meat in pre-WWII America, causing Teddy Roosevelt to trash his breakfast sausages. 

Additionally, our bodies might run on caloric intake, but they&#039;re not calorimeters. Vinegar affects blood-sugar - and by proxy, the feeling of satiety - despite the fact that it is not high-calorie. Free glutamates also affect how satisfying a food might taste. I believe there is a hypothesis proposed that artificial sweeteners might go against brain chemistry by causing the body to expect sugar to be entering the bloodstream - but when no sugar enters it, the craving for sugar (*actual* sugar) remains.

I like my food simple and I like being able to pronounce the ingredients. I&#039;m not necessarily opposed to MSG being used in food, but I question why the food product might need MSG in the *first* place. Is it not sufficiently delicious on its own, without chemical enhancement? 

I recently discovered at the salad bar that rather than use the bottled dressing (which I never really liked that much anyway, nor used much of) I can make my own dressing combining olive oil, red wine vinegar, rice vinegar, and a little salt, oregano, and black pepper. It tastes much better, compliments the food better, and doesn&#039;t contain extra sugar, chemicals, or sodium. (Much of that sodium comes from preservative chemicals and not even for affecting the flavor of the food.) 

I do eat some &quot;processed foods;&quot; don&#039;t get me wrong. But I also believe that you are what you eat and try to reflect that in my diet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What differentiates this diet a little more from the &#8220;old fashioned, normal&#8221; diet is that a &#8220;normal&#8221; diet could include any number of processed foods, so long as the calories add up to the right amount. I&#8217;m all for enjoying the benefits of technology, such as pasteurization and refrigeration, but I also like my food to be.. food. And this isn&#8217;t a millenial &#8220;green-minded&#8221; trend &#8211; Upton Sinclair noted in the 1910&#8242;s the appalling conditions (and often ingredients) used to process meat in pre-WWII America, causing Teddy Roosevelt to trash his breakfast sausages. </p>
<p>Additionally, our bodies might run on caloric intake, but they&#8217;re not calorimeters. Vinegar affects blood-sugar &#8211; and by proxy, the feeling of satiety &#8211; despite the fact that it is not high-calorie. Free glutamates also affect how satisfying a food might taste. I believe there is a hypothesis proposed that artificial sweeteners might go against brain chemistry by causing the body to expect sugar to be entering the bloodstream &#8211; but when no sugar enters it, the craving for sugar (*actual* sugar) remains.</p>
<p>I like my food simple and I like being able to pronounce the ingredients. I&#8217;m not necessarily opposed to MSG being used in food, but I question why the food product might need MSG in the *first* place. Is it not sufficiently delicious on its own, without chemical enhancement? </p>
<p>I recently discovered at the salad bar that rather than use the bottled dressing (which I never really liked that much anyway, nor used much of) I can make my own dressing combining olive oil, red wine vinegar, rice vinegar, and a little salt, oregano, and black pepper. It tastes much better, compliments the food better, and doesn&#8217;t contain extra sugar, chemicals, or sodium. (Much of that sodium comes from preservative chemicals and not even for affecting the flavor of the food.) </p>
<p>I do eat some &#8220;processed foods;&#8221; don&#8217;t get me wrong. But I also believe that you are what you eat and try to reflect that in my diet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

