<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skeptical blogging brainstorm #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2008/09/skeptical-blogging-brainstorm-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2008/09/skeptical-blogging-brainstorm-2/</link>
	<description>critical analysis and interesting ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: <img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5712fe874cd961a1cbaec758bc7ad75e&#38;size=48&#38;default=http://www.thoughtcounts.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/c17df82385604b7.png" alt="AndyD Identicon Icon" height="48" width="48" /> AndyD</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2008/09/skeptical-blogging-brainstorm-2/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator><img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=5712fe874cd961a1cbaec758bc7ad75e&#38;size=48&#38;default=http://www.thoughtcounts.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/c17df82385604b7.png" alt="AndyD Identicon Icon" height="48" width="48" /> AndyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtcounts.net/?p=106#comment-579</guid>
		<description>It seems to me the trick would be to find a positive drive. Most of us bloggers focus on the problems, not necessarily the solutions. A group based on complaining or finding fault might be fun for a while but hardly sustainable - or useful. If that same group could somehow find ways to implement change in the community, it would have more purpose.

I&#039;ve been thinking along similar lines since first looking in on the &quot;skeptic movement&quot; earlier this year - who are we, what are we about? In my latest blog article I ask the question - should we be targeting the woo-artists or the media that so readily promote them?

Perhaps some concerted efforts by groups with labels could help bring a bit of rational thinking into areas where it&#039;s currently missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me the trick would be to find a positive drive. Most of us bloggers focus on the problems, not necessarily the solutions. A group based on complaining or finding fault might be fun for a while but hardly sustainable &#8211; or useful. If that same group could somehow find ways to implement change in the community, it would have more purpose.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking along similar lines since first looking in on the &#8220;skeptic movement&#8221; earlier this year &#8211; who are we, what are we about? In my latest blog article I ask the question &#8211; should we be targeting the woo-artists or the media that so readily promote them?</p>
<p>Perhaps some concerted efforts by groups with labels could help bring a bit of rational thinking into areas where it&#8217;s currently missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

