<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civil unions for everyone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2008/05/civil-unions-for-everyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2008/05/civil-unions-for-everyone/</link>
	<description>critical analysis and interesting ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: <img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=f70a488e71be5b0aeff12acd62222006&#38;size=48&#38;default=http://www.thoughtcounts.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/0dfaa63992d9819.png" alt="Progressive Conservative Identicon Icon" height="48" width="48" /> Progressive Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2008/05/civil-unions-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator><img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=f70a488e71be5b0aeff12acd62222006&#38;size=48&#38;default=http://www.thoughtcounts.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/0dfaa63992d9819.png" alt="Progressive Conservative Identicon Icon" height="48" width="48" /> Progressive Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtcounts.net/?p=6#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with this solution, though I would take it one step further:

&quot;[I] would like to see governments offer civil unions to any two people who care enough to be responsible for each other. This would include men and women, same-sex partnerships, mothers and sons, brothers and sisters, friends and cousins. It would create a sense of responsibility among the people entering these unions and a society where people take care of one another is always a good thing.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/gay-marriage/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;

Obviously this system is subject to abuse, but it&#039;s a good goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with this solution, though I would take it one step further:</p>
<p>&#8220;[I] would like to see governments offer civil unions to any two people who care enough to be responsible for each other. This would include men and women, same-sex partnerships, mothers and sons, brothers and sisters, friends and cousins. It would create a sense of responsibility among the people entering these unions and a society where people take care of one another is always a good thing.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://thebigstick.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/gay-marriage/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>
<p>Obviously this system is subject to abuse, but it&#8217;s a good goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=eedfa2bb07a2c62eea582e765ce58ff1&#38;size=48&#38;default=http://www.thoughtcounts.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/fc0460a8b13c95c.png" alt="kevin Identicon Icon" height="48" width="48" /> kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2008/05/civil-unions-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><img class="identicon" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=eedfa2bb07a2c62eea582e765ce58ff1&#38;size=48&#38;default=http://www.thoughtcounts.net/wp-content/plugins/wp-identicon/identicon/fc0460a8b13c95c.png" alt="kevin Identicon Icon" height="48" width="48" /> kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtcounts.net/?p=6#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I was flipping through the book Nudge (http://is.gd/ETx), and they make the same suggestion. They call it &#039;privatizing marriage&#039; (ie., making marriage a private matter performed by churches or other social groups, and making civil unions the only legal option.) Sounds like the best option to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was flipping through the book Nudge (<a href="http://is.gd/ETx" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/ETx</a>), and they make the same suggestion. They call it &#8216;privatizing marriage&#8217; (ie., making marriage a private matter performed by churches or other social groups, and making civil unions the only legal option.) Sounds like the best option to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s the Thought that Counts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on discrimination</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtcounts.net/2008/05/civil-unions-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s the Thought that Counts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on discrimination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtcounts.net/?p=6#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] thing to highlight here, since we&#8217;ve touched on those issues a couple times already (see this post on civil unions and this one on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thing to highlight here, since we&#8217;ve touched on those issues a couple times already (see this post on civil unions and this one on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

